The individual accused of trying to assassinate Donald Trump confessed his readiness to shoot through crowds to get to his intended targets in a troubling manifesto sent moments before the incident.
Cole Tomas Allen, the alleged gunman at the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner, reportedly detailed his plans for the shooting at the Washington Hilton, specifying the weapons he intended to use and the extent he was willing to go.
One disturbing excerpt from his writings stated: “To minimize casualties, I will utilize buckshot instead of slugs (less wall penetration). I would pass through most individuals present to reach the targets if absolutely necessary (given that most attendees chose to listen to a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, making them complicit), but I sincerely hope it does not come to that.”
The manifesto, sent to relatives a mere 10 minutes before the attack, outlined what Allen referred to as his “rules of engagement,” with top government figures as his main objectives, as per the NY Post.
The 30-year-old additionally penned: “Administration officials (excluding Mr. Patel): they are targets, ranked from highest to lowest.” He indicated that law enforcement would only be targeted if unavoidable, specifying: “Secret Service: they are targets only if needed, and should be non-fatally incapacitated if possible.”
The most concerning aspect was his apparent willingness to shoot through bystanders, raising major concerns among experts about the heightened risk faced by all those present. In other parts of the document, Allen tried to rationalize his actions, stating: “I refuse to let a pedophile, rapist, and traitor taint my hands with his crimes,” seemingly referring to Trump.
He also expressed remorse and issued apologies to family, colleagues, and strangers impacted by the attack, expressing: “I am not seeking forgiveness, but if there was any other way to approach this, I would have taken it. Once again, my sincere apologies.”
In a paradoxical manner, the suspect both displayed regret and discussed his plan in a calculated manner, even deliberating on ammunition choices and their potential effects. The manifesto concluded with a furious critique of security at the hotel, claiming he entered armed without raising suspicion.
“What security measures does the Secret Service have in place?” he questioned. “I anticipated surveillance cameras at every turn… Instead, there was nothing. No security whatsoever. I walked in carrying multiple weapons, and not a single individual there considered the possibility of me posing a threat.”
<p